I’ve been getting so many inquiries on my recent research around brand content management. Not necessarily about the vendor scorecards therein, though that has certainly created quite some debate, but more about the “name itself”. They ask, “why create a new software application category called brand content management?”
Well, firstly, I do not want to create any software application category. That is not what I am doing with my research. I am sitting back and considering the world from the business practitioners’ point of view and naming their most important business process, or perhaps family of processes. Why? Well, because I think that is how business people actually plan their automation projects and look for suitable software or SaaS suppliers. When we run our surveys, we discuss the process first and then discuss which vendors they work with to improve that process in their company.
I think that brand content management is now a key process in any marketing department. As well as managing and distributing all their digital content assets effectively, marketers care very much about the usage of their brand messaging across the company, from corporate brand to the individual messaging statements around products. Companies working in a more distributed (sometimes called local) marketing environment must even deploy this process across ecosystems of subsidiaries, and external business partners.
In the (very) old days, the brand used to be just the logo, typeface and Pantone reference, and marketers helped business partners use the right brand by providing binders or books with the printed article. Now, the
The survey we did on brand content management showed this. The number 1 investment priority cited was “Consolidated management of all content assets” while close behind was “Managing brand messaging across the company”.
The vendor who was scored highest by business practitioners for the business process of brand content marketing was BrandMaker. The next leaders were Censhare, BrandMuscle, BrandSystems
Over half of the respondents are investing in this topic for the first time. Those companies will be looking for a new content management platform that can handle all the content types they now have; is easy to use even for casual users; integrates to their existing systems and databases
- Integration has become a significant requirement. As IT increases its influence on marketing projects, there is
increasedfocus on integration capabilities to other marketing systems, including Product Information Management, CRM and MLM, even eCommerce systems.
- Vendor consolidation is a priority. Ultimately, marketers will want to avoid working with too many vendors; so a “good enough” solution from an incumbent vendor may suffice. Many marketing departments are not as sophisticated as you would like.
- Cloud-based solutions are preferred. SaaS-based software has made this automation technology easier to adopt and to integrate. This also results in increased interest from midmarket companies with smaller teams who can now afford to invest.
- Marketing attribution becomes a business fundamental. Attribution remains a priority for B2B and B2B2C, mainly given the reality of increasing privacy legislation to adequately track behaviors and as the proliferation of available customer touchpoints
mount. For companies with significant channel business, accurate attribution to the worthy partner is also an economic priority.
- Brand Content Management systems become platforms for all formats of communication. The definition of brand content has expanded from corporate or product literature to include social media communications, video and other formats.
Always keeping you informed! Peter
The Vendor Selection Matrix for brand content management is available here in a public version. Clients who purchase the report also obtain further data including vendor scorecards for each of the top ten vendors in the matrix.