Propensity to Switch CDM Vendors
A few months ago, I had collected together all the Recommendation Index (RI) values from my 2020 Vendor Selection MatrixTM reports on various marketing process automation topics. I had proposed that I see this becoming a significant leading indicator of long-term customer satisfaction but also, more importantly, of the propensity to switch indicated by customers. It is for that reason that we have included the points earned through the RI score in our Strategy axis on the matrix and give it a significant 25% weighting.
in our surveys, we actually ask about two items directly related to customer retention: the current satisfaction, and the “would you recommend this vendor?” question. Customer satisfaction is defined as a measurement that determines how happy customers are right now with the solution being evaluated and flows into the Execution axis of the matrix.
The RI (the simple percentage of respondents who answer “yes”) encapsulates a longer- term, more strategic element of customer satisfaction – essentially it is a measurement of customer loyalty.
Vendors. I think that any RI 95% or over is satisfactory, an RI between 90-94% should raise some alarm signals about your customers’ emerging propensity to switch, while below 90% is already a state of alarm.
Buyers. There is nothing stopping you interpreting the numbers in a similar manner.
The first blog had the data for Marketing Lead Management, Sales Engagement Management, and
Marketing Resource Management vendors. Here is the data from my latest report on Customer Data Management. The table shows quite a range of Recommendation Index values — but all in the 90s. However, as this is a relatively new area of investment and quite a few companies (users) are still creating, developing and/or tuning their CDM strategy, there is likely to be some churn in this market segment over the next years.
Always keeping you informed! Peter
COVID-19 Changes Everything About Partnerships
Last winter, (BEFORE Covid-19), I fielded a global survey asking 1500 manufacturers/vendors about their channel marketing and enablement projects. We asked about their investment drivers, giving 15 options. The 1500 ranked “involving partners in our own digital marketing programs” as #6 in their priorities – so already a top priority. In discussions with channel partners themselves, I find that this is even more important to them, as they see digital business truly dominating marketing, selling and business relationships.
Manufacturers must now deal with a highly-volatile partner community through a much more complete business cycle: from connection to order processing and service delivery …. a quite different partner management world.
How different and why ?
Well, I see this transformation under seven separate trend headlines with all these aspects of channel management moving, over time, from the left-side state to the emerging state described on the right-side.
Let’s be honest, for decades channel enablement and marketing was just a peripheral process in most industries; the mantra was: “first we sell direct and then we’ll find some partners”. Most firms were selling physical products (or at least on-premise software) and just needed knowledgeable sellers to position the offer to buyers they couldn’t reach.
But now … almost every industry is morphing to an “as-a-service” business model. And buyers pull the service based on their own research. But heh!, channel partners are not being “dis-intermediated” — this was such a strange cliché back in the 1990s when the Internet took hold and everybody was writing about eBusiness and eCommerce taking work away from channel partners. If anything, the channel has become even more influential and advocational for businesses. But the business model in the channel has changed too and they’re more than likely to live off revenues earned from the end-user, than from the manufacturer they now occasionally represent. And in addition to resellers or distributors, we now have channel players called affiliates, referrers, associations, communities, groups, ambassadors.
In fact, just as we like to talk about customer-centric or buyer-led purchasing, the partners are now taking control over the partnerships they need to maintain with vendors. From push to pull. Vendors can no longer map-out their target markets and plan partnerships around the battlefield like generals ordering armies around a warzone. The market, the partner communities, run the new game.
This is not only the case in the tech industry. Consider leading manufacturer of industrial bearings, Sheaffler Group in Germany. They’ve found that their new sensor technology creates a whole set of opportunities as an Internet-of-Things data provider. The sensors they’ve installed in trains, combined with AI technology, can provide vital maintenance data on the railway track itself, which is sold to the Bundesbahn who maintain the infrastructure. Schaeffler continues to be a manufacturer but now also has a data service business with new partnerships. As-a-Service is happening everywhere.
That is the bigger picture and most trends are the result of changing expectations on the buyer side and the proliferation of digital channels across all businesses and industries. It has been the fact that digital transformation has been somewhat held-up in certain countries and industries due to the classical resistance to change. But COVID-19 has burned away many of those hurdles. Hardly any executive or HR manager will now claim that WFH is bad for business. Companies have learned quickly to continue most of their business relationships both internally and externally through digital media.
Here are the most important other trends I think are here to stay:
- An optimized experience. The business imperative will become “Provide The Optimal Customer Experience”. Manufacturers will need to ensure that their channel partners are part of that experience and therefore need to provide customer insights to them.
- More effective tools. Partner management platforms will help manufacturers to manage thousands of partners of all types without making 80% of them feel inadequate because they are only a silver-tier partner and do not warrant personal attention.
- Better enabled Partners. There is an even larger boom in sales enablement investments at the moment. Clearly, sellers now interact with buyers digitally, remotely and the signs are, that buyers like this new behavior and will prefer it to become permanent. So they will focus on those suppliers who have the capability to support them. But, as I tell every client I talk to: “Channel enablement must be part of the sales enablement program”.
The current crisis has created a sort of perfect storm for sales and channel enablement projects and that is a change that I think will outlast COVID-19 and become a strategic imperative in many companies over 2021 and beyond. Those channel enablement and marketing platform vendors who can cover the needs described above will flourish in this marketplace.
To learn more on how to stay ahead of these trends, watch this webinar (which is gated) which I presented with Kerry Desberg, who is CMO for Channel Management Software Vendor Impartner. I have known Kerry for several years now and she was so kind as to invite me to be a member of the Impartner Channel Chief Advisory Board (CCAB). The CCAB is a group comprised of top channel thought leaders, analysts and consultants who each have decades of channel experience and insights to contribute to channel best practice discussions.
Always keeping you informed! Peter